Online ISSN: 2325-7466
2006
Triannual
National Association of Special Education Teachers (NASET)
United States

Articles

What Factors Contribute to Self-Efficacy

  • Hildy Straus, Ph.D. (Author) Fordham University image/svg+xml
    Hildy Straus, Ph.D. is a special education teacher for the Kiryas Joel UFSD in Monroe, NY. As a classroom teacher and administrator, she has worked with paraeducators for over 25 years.
  • Rhonda Bondie, Ph.D. (Author) Fordham University
    Rhonda Bondie, Ph.D. is an assistant professor in special education at Fordham University. Rhonda’s research focuses on differentiated instruction and teacher preparation through digital teaching platforms. Rhonda maintains two websites for teacher learning, Project REACH Online.org and ALL-ED.org.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.282
Abstract
This study examined the self-efficacy of paraeducators serving students with moderate to severe disabilities in a specialized public school. Quantitative methods explored the relationship among paraeducator self-efficacy, personal factors (including work experience, age level of teaching assignment, and disability served), and organizational factors (including role of paraeducator, collaboration, professional development, job satisfaction, and supervision). Seventy-five paraeducators working in a suburban public school responded to the Paraeducator Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale and the Paraeducator Descriptive Questionnaire. Findings indicated that overall, personal or organizational factors were not predictors of self-efficacy. However, the organizational factor of job satisfaction was a significant predictor of self-efficacy, suggesting that paraeducators should be encouraged to express their wants and needs. Additionally, strong relationships were present between supervision and role definition and also between job satisfaction and collaboration.
Keywords
Individual Characteristics, Institutional Characteristics, Job Satisfaction, Likert Scales, Organizational Climate, Organizational Culture
References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Carter, E., O’Rourke, L., Sisco, L. G., & Pelsue, D. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 344-359. doi:10.1177/074193250832439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324399

Chopra, R. V., & French, N. (2004). Paraeducator relationships with parents of students with significant disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 240-251. doi:10.1177/07419325040250040701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040701

Chopra, R. V., Sandoval-Lucero, E., & French, N. K. (2011). Effective supervision of paraeducators: Multiple benefits and outcomes. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(2), 15-26. Retrieved from www.ntejournal.com

Devlin, P. (2008). Create effective teacher-paraprofessional teams. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(1), 41-44. doi:10.1177/1053451208318874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208318874

Downing, J. E., Ryndak, D. L., & Clark, D. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms: Their own perceptions. Remedial and Special Education, 21(3), 171-181. doi:10.1177/ 074193250002100308 Fischer, M., & Pleasants, S. (2011, February 7). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education. Retrieved from: http://rse.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/02/07/0741932510397762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250002100308

French, N. K., & Chopra, R. V. (2006). Teachers as executives. Theory into Practice, 45(3), 230-238. doi:10.1207/s1543042tip4503_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_5

French, N. K., & Pickett, A. (1997). Paraprofessional in special education: Issues for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20(1), 61-73. doi:10.1177/ 088840649702000107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088840649702000107

Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., & Broer, S. M. (2003). Schoolwide planning to improve paraeducator supports. Exceptional Children, 70, 63-79. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/ec DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290307000104

Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., Broer, S. M., & Doyle, M. B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 45-63. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/ec DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106800103

Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., Luiselli, T., & MacFarland, S. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7-18. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/ec DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706400101

Hughes, M. T., & Valle-Riestra, D. M. (2008). Responsibilities, preparedness, and job satisfaction of paraprofessionals: working with young children with disabilities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(2), 163-173. doi:10.1080/09669760701516892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760701516892

Keller, C. L., Bucholz, J., & Brady, M. P. (2007). Yes I can! Empowering paraprofessionals to teach learning strategies. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(3), 18-23. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/tec DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990703900303

Lasater, M. W., Johnson, M. M., & Fitzgerald, M. (2000). Completing the education mosaic: Paraeducator professional development options. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(1), 46-51. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/tec DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990003300109

Morgan, J., Ashbaker, B. Y., & Forbush, D. (1998). Strengthening the teaching team: Teachers and paraprofessionals learning together. Support for Learning, 13(3), 115-117. doi:10.1111/1467-9604.00071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.00071

New York State Education Department. (2011). Office of Teaching Initiatives. Qualifications and requirements. Retrieved from http://highered.nysed.gov/tcert/career/ta.html#two

No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-110 (2002).

Patterson, K. B. (2006). Roles and responsibilities of paraprofessionals: In their own words. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 2(5) Article 1. Retrieved from http://escholarship.bc.edu/education/tecplus/vol2/iss5/art1.

Riggs, C. G. (2001). Ask the paraprofessionals: What are your training needs? Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 78-83. Retrieved from http://journals.cec.sped.org/tec DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990103300312

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). (2013). Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Tuchman, B. (1999). Conducting education research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (trans. A. Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wall, S., Davis, K., Crowley, A., & White, L. (2005). The urban paraprofessional goes to college. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 183-190. Retrieved from www.rse.sagepub.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260030601

Walter-Thomas, C. (1997). Co-teaching experiences: The benefit and problems that teachers and principals report over time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 395-407. doi:10.1177/002221949703000406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000406

There are 24 references in total.
How to Cite
Straus, H., & Bondie, R. (2015). What Factors Contribute to Self-Efficacy. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 10(3), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.282

Fall 2015

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted August 19, 2015
  • Published October 15, 2015
  • Issue Fall 2015
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 2
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.