Special Education Professionals and Assistive Technology: Requirements for Preparation in a Digital Age

George R. Peterson-Karlan; Jack J. Hourcade; Howard P. Parette; Brian W. Wojcik

doi:10.64546/jaasep.37

Special Education Professionals and Assistive Technology: Requirements for Preparation in a Digital Age

George R. Peterson-Karlan, Jack J. Hourcade, Howard P. Parette, Brian W. Wojcik Author Details

George R. Peterson-Karlan (Author) Illinois State University
Jack J. Hourcade (Author) Boise State University
Howard P. Parette (Author) Illinois State University
Brian W. Wojcik (Author) Illinois State University

DOI

https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.37

Abstract

This article presents contextual background for the preparation of teachers to effectively use assistive technology (AT) with students with disabilities. A brief description of student uses of technology is presented, noting how students have changed in their understanding and use of information technologies. The role of AT is then presented, linking the role of special education professionals in today’s schools with current teacher preparation practices. Discrepancies are noted between what is needed to best serve Digital Age students in the schools, and the manner and extent to which teachers are prepared. Using existing standards and addressing emerging AT training needs, the authors propose three distinct levels of preparation: an AT (a) practitioner, (b) specialist, and (c) leader. Specific roles of each of these personnel are delineated. The instructional potential use of hybrid models of professional development classroom instruction combined with computer-based learning) is recommended as particularly promising approach.

Keywords

Special Education Teachers, Specialists, Technology Uses in Education, Standards, Knowledge Level, Assistive Technology

References

Ashton, T. (2004). Assistive technology teams: A model for developing school district teams. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(3), 47-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340401900305

Behrmann, M., & Jerome, M. K. (2002). Assistive technology for students with mild disabilities: Update 2002. ERIC Digest E623, Document No. EDO-EC-02-01.

Blackhurst, A. E. (1997). Perspectives on technology in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(5), 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999702900509

Blackhurst, A. E. (2005). Historical perspective about technology applications for people with disabilities. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 3-29). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.

Council for Exceptional Children. (in press). What every special educator must know. Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (7th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved February 17, 2006, from http://www.cec.sped.org/ps/technology.doc

Council for Exceptional Children. (2005). Universal Design for Learning: A guide for teachers and education professionals. Arlington, VA: Author.

Edyburn, D. L. (2000). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32(9), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v32i9.6776

Friedman, M. (2004, March). Assistive technology research and development collaborative on cognitive disabilities. Paper presented to the 2004 CSUN Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference, Northridge, CA. Retrieved February 9, 2005, from http://www.biausa.org/word.files.to.pdf/good.pdfs/CSUN2004finalused.pdf

Gilliland, K. (2002). Calculators in the classroom. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8, 150-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.8.3.0150

Golden, D. (1998). Assistive technology in special education: Policy & practice. CASE/TAM Assistive Technology Policy and Practice Series (Non-Classroom Use): Council of Administrators of Special Education, Inc.[BBB19716], Council for Exceptional Children, Reston, VA. Technology and Media Div.[BBB30277].

Grandgenett, N. F., & Topp, N. W. (2005). University students of tomorrow: Changing experiences, changing expectations, changing brains. Metropolitan Universities, 16(4), 39-53.

Hasselbring, T. S., & Bausch, M. E. (2004, November). Are AT knowledge and skills being developed at the pre-service level? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, Albuquerque, NM.

Hasselbring, T. S., & Bottge, B. A. (2000). Planning and implementing technology programs in inclusive settings. In J. D. Lindsey (Ed.), Technology and exceptional individuals (3rd ed., pp. 91-113). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Hetzroni, O. E., & Shrieber, B. (2004). Word processing as an assistive technology tool for enhancing academic outcomes of students with writing disabilities in the general classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 143-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370020501

Hourcade, J. J., & Bauwens, J. (2003). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding and sharing the schoolhouse (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. Jankowski, L. (1998). Educational Computing: Why Use a Computer for Writing? Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(6), 30-33.

Lahm, E. A. (2003). Assistive technology specialists: Bringing knowledge of assistive technology to school districts. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 141-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240030301

Learning First Alliance. (2003, January). The No Child Left Behind Act: Key provisions and timelines. Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.learningfirst.org/lfa-web/rp?pa=doc&docId=25

Leibowitz, W. R. (1999). Technology transforms writing and the teaching of writing. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(14), A67-A68.

Mark, R. (2003). School web access soars, digital divide still remains. Retrieved August 29, 2006, from http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:Z7tWWWgHrMsJ:www.clickz.com/showPage.html%3Fpage%3D3101281+ratio+of+students+to+computers&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=23

Meyen, E. L., Aust, R., Gauch, J. M., Hinton, H. S., Isaacson, R. E., Smith, S., et al. (2004). e-Learning: A programmatic research construct for the future. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340201700303

Michaels, C., & McDermott, D. (2003). Assistive technology integration in special education teacher preparation: Program coordinators’ perceptions of current attainment and importance. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(3), 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340301800302

National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Computer and internet use by children and adolescents in 2001. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2004014

National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. (2006). Glossary for intent forms. Retrieved September 5, 2006, from http://www.ncate.org/documents/GlossaryIntentForms.pdf

Ohio Department of Education. (2005). How are Ohio's students performing on state assessments? Retrieved August 28, 2006, from http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/DocumentManagement/DocumentDownload.aspx?DocumentID

=11834 Peterson-Karlan, G. R., & Parette, H. P. (in press). Integrating assistive technology into the curriculum. In H. P. Parette, G. R. Peterson-Karlan, & R. Ringlaben (Eds.), Research-based practices in developmental disabilities. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Peterson-Karlan, G. R., Wojcik, B. W., & Parette, H. P. (2005, November). A comprehensive model for AT preparation. Paper presented to the 1st Annual TAM-TED Conference, Portland, ME.

Puckett, K. S. (2004). Project ACCESS: Field-testing an assistive technology toolkit for students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 5-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340401900201

Renwick, L. (2006). Community connections. District Administration, 42(8), 30.

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform (A report prepared for the Office of Special Education Technology). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.

Special Education Assistive Technology (SEAT) Center. (2004). Day of visioning: Increasing access to assistive technology. Normal, IL: Author. Retrieved February 26, 2006, from http://www.seat.ilstu.org/resources/Visioning2004/

SEAT Center, National Center for Technology Innovation, and University of Kansas. (2006). Assistive technology outcomes summit. Assistive technology and educational progress…Charting a new direction. Executive summary. Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://www.nationaltechcenter.org/documents/ExecutiveSummaryFinal.pdf

Smith, S. (2001). Technology 101: Integration beyond a technology foundations course. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(1), 43-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340101600105

Thompson, J. R., Bakken, J. P., Fulk, B. M., & Peterson-Karlan, G. (2005). Using technology to improve the literacy skills of students with disabilities. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from North Central Regional Education Laboratory web site: http://www.ncrel.org/litweb/disability.pdf.

Trotter, A. (2003). Federal act boosts student standards aimed at technology. Education Week, 23(1), 1, 20.

Turnbull, R., Huerta, N., & Stowe, M. (2006). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act as amended in 2004. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PearsonMerrill Prentice-Hall.

Wojcik, B. W., Peterson-Karlan, G., Watts, E. H., & Parette, P. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes in a teacher education curriculum. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1, 21-32.

There are 36 references in total. Show More References

How to Cite

Peterson-Karlan, G. R., Hourcade, J. J., Parette, H. P., & Wojcik, B. W. (2007). Special Education Professionals and Assistive Technology: Requirements for Preparation in a Digital Age. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 2(3), 68-82. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.37