An Investigation of Agency and Marginality in Special Education

Authors

  • Robert C. McOuat (Author) Director, Program for Exceptional Children Davidson County Schools
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.55
A qualitative case study design was used to investigate the extent that special education program serves the student or serves the organization. If special education serves the student, then a researcher should be able to identify resulting agency and emancipation among the students. However, if special education is serving the organization, then a different picture could be painted. Special education could be serving the functionalist needs of sorting and tracking students. An unintended finding of the study was the apparent neglect and subsequent isolation and marginality of special education teachers, especially teachers who work in self-contained classes. Responses clearly reflect a deficit in social capital. With regard to students, most responses reflect a functionalist approach to serving students in the special education program in that the program sorts challenging students from the mainstream who might impede the progress of other children. These findings are discussed relative to reform for special education, including learning communities.

Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R.T., & Seigelman (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. Amercian Edcuational Research Journal, 41, (3), pp. 557-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041003557

Apple, W.M. (1996). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? In Cultural Politics and Education (pp. 22-41). New York: Teachers College.

Brosio, R. (1994). Capitalism’s mediated influence within school sites: Correspondence theory and empirical description. In A Radical Democratic Critique of Capitalistic Education. New York: Peter Lang.

Capper C.A., Fratura, E., & Keyes, M. W. (2000). The social and legal impetus for services rather than programs. In Meeting the needs of students of all abilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Feinberg, W. & Soltis J.F. (1998). School & Society. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Malloy, W. (2002). Principals as a learning community: A Case Study. In I.N. Guadarrama, J. Nath & Ramsey (Eds.), Research in Professional Developmental Schools. Information Use Publishing; Dallas, TX.

Mitchell, C., Sackney, L. & WalkerJ. (1997). The postmodern phenomena: Ramifications for school organizations and educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations, 1(11), 38-67.

Nieto, S. (1999). Who does the accommodating? Institutional Transformation to Promote Learning. In The Light in Their Eyes: Crating Multi-Cultural Learning Communities, pp. 72-102.

Spillane, J.P. & Thompson, C.L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency’s capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and policy Analysis, 19, 185-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1164209

Spring, J. (1994). The purpose of schooling. In American education, 6th edition, (pp. 3-29). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tyack, D. & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering Toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

Wilbur, G. (1998). Schools as equity cultures. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 13 (2), 123-147.

There are 12 references in total.
McOuat, R. C. (2008). An Investigation of Agency and Marginality in Special Education. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 3(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.55

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted May 25, 2008
  • Published June 15, 2008
  • Issue Summer 2008
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 1
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.