Does Repeated Reading Improve Reading Fluency and Comprehension for Struggling Adolescent Readers?

Authors

  • Kristine Lynn Still, Ph.D. (Author) Cleveland State University image/svg+xml
  • Christine A. Flynt (Author) Cleveland State University
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.172
This was a 12-week study that explored the effects of repeated peer readings on struggling adolescent readers. It was a quasi-experimental design with one treatment group and one control group. There were two small group English classes that were consistently using the repeated reading strategy (the treatment group) and students in the co-teach English class who were not using the repeated reading strategy (the control group). The students were not randomly assigned. The pre- and posttests given were the AIMSweb (to measure fluency) and Scholastic Reading Inventory (to measure comprehension). This study investigated the effects of repeated peer reading on reading fluency and comprehension. It also explored the relationship between reading fluency and comprehension. In the area of reading fluency, the results showed that one participant in the treatment group increased and five participants from the control group improved. In the area of reading comprehension, six of the treatment group participants increased and six of the control group participants improved. The participants in the treatment group had larger gains in comprehension than did the control group participants. The data indicated an inconsistent relationship between reading fluency and comprehension.

Albrecht, M. (2009). The effects of repeated reading and question generation on reading fluency and comprehension (Unpublished master's thesis). Miami University, Oxford, OH.

Applegate, M., Applegate, A. J., & Modla, V. B. (2009). “She’s my best reader; she just can’t comprehend”: Studying the relationship between fluency and comprehension. Reading Teacher, 62(6), 512-521. Retrieved from EBSCO host Clark, S. K. (2006). Daily warm-ups: Reading. Westminster, CA: Teacher Created Resources.

Curtis, M. E. (2004). Adolescents who struggle with word identification. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 119-134). New York: The Guilford Press.

Dudley, A. M. (2005). Rethinking reading fluency for struggling adolescent readers. Beyond Behavior, 14(3), 16-22. Retrieved from EBSCOhost

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E. B., Levy, B., & Rasinski, T. V. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251. Retrieved from EBSCOhost DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4

Lo, Y., Cooke, N. L., & Starling, A. (2011). Using a repeated reading program to improve generalization of oral reading fluency. Education & Treatment of Children, 34(1), 115-140. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspecitves from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 123-146. doi:10.1080/1057356970130203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2011.0007

Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R. O., & Barkley, E. A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 54(1), 12-23. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Nelson, J. S., Alber, S. R., & Gordy, A. (2004). Effects of systematic error correction and repeated readings on the reading accuracy and proficiency of second graders with disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 27(3), 186-198. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Pruitt, B., & Cooper, J. T. (2008). Ready, set, go: Three strategies to build reading fluency. (Cover story). Beyond Behavior, 17(3), 8-13. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. D., McKeon, C. A., Wilfong, L. G., Friedauer, J. A., & Heim, P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(1), 22-27. doi:10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.1.3

Rasinski, T., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 350-361. doi:10.1080/1938807080246875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070802468715

Roundy, A. R., & Roundy, P. T. (2009). The effect of repeated reading on student fluency: Does practice always make perfect? International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 54-59.

Samuels, S. J., Ediger, K. A., & Fautch-Patridge, T. (2005). The importance of fluent reading. The New England Reading Association Journal, 41(1), 1-8.

Technical guide: Working with student performance data. (2007). In Scholastic Reading Inventory. New York: Scholastic.

Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801

Remedial & Special Education, 25(4), 252-261. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Thomas, C., & Wexler, J. (2007). 10 ways to teach and support struggling adolescent readers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(1), 22-27. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Valleley, R. J., & Shriver, M. D. (2003). An examination of the effects of repeated readings with secondary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(1), 55-76. Retrieved from EBSCOhost DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2007.10516487

There are 13 references in total.
Still, K. L., & Flynt, C. A. (2012). Does Repeated Reading Improve Reading Fluency and Comprehension for Struggling Adolescent Readers?. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 7(1), 152-175. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.172

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted December 31, 2011
  • Published February 15, 2012
  • Issue Winter 2012
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 0
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.