Students with Disabilities’ Perspectives of STEM Content and Careers
Alston, R. J., & Hampton, J. (2000). Science and engineering as viable career choices for students with disabilities: A survey of parents and teachers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43(3), 158-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003435520004300306
Alston, R. J., Hampton, J.L., Bell, T.J., & Strauss, M. (1998). Matriculation of persons with disabilities in science and engineering: Perceptions of rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 29(3), 5-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/0047-2220.29.3.5
Anderman, Eric M. (1998). The middle school experience: Effects on the math and science achievement of adolescents with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 128-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100203
Basham, James D., Israel, Maya, & Maynard, Kathie. (2010). An ecological model of STEM education: Operationalizing STEM FOR ALL. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(3), 9-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341002500303
Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the 'digital natives' debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students' technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 321-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
Bennett, S., Maton, Karl, & Kervin, Lisa. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Burgstahler, Sheryl, & Chang, Chuan. (2009). Promising interventions for promoting STEM fields to students who have disabilities. Review of Disability Studies An International Journal, 5(2), 29-47.
Burgstahler, Sheryl, & Doyle, Andrea. (2005). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication among adolescents with disabilities: A case study. Disability Studies Quarterly, 25(2). http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/552/729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v25i2.552
Cantley, Penny. (2011). A study examining the effectiveness of the ME! lessons to teach self-awareness and self-advocacy to students with disabilities. (Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation), University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. (3454008)
Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering. (2006). 2005-2006 Biennial report to Congress. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Crockett, Jean B. (2004). Taking stock of science in the schoolhouse: Four ideas to foster effective instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(3), 189-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370030201
Dunn, Cari, Rabren, Karen S., Taylor, Stephanie L., & Dotson, Courtney K. (2012). Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(1), 47-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212443151
Henderson, C. (1999). College freshman with disabilities: Statistical year 1998. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Henderson, C. (2001). College freshman with disabilities: A biennial statisical profile. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role sterotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 932-944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.932
Lam, Paul, Doverspike, Dennis, Zhao, Julie, Zhe, John, & Menzemer, Craig. (2008). An evaluation of a STEM program for middle school students on Learning Disability related IEPs. Journal of STEM Education, 9(1&2), 21-29.
Lee, M., & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of science-technology-society teaching on students' attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativeity. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 1315-1327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600972974
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social congitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.47.1.36
Malian, I. (2007). MVIP: Math villages for inclusive practices: A model to engage all students and teachers in STEM experiences. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 7(2). http://www.cehs.wright.edu/resources/publications/ejie/WinterSpring2011/JIE%20MVIP.htm
Margaryan, Anoush, Littlejohn, Allison, & Vojt, Gabrielle. (2011). Are digial natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
Marino, Matthew T., & Beecher, Constance C. (2010). Conceptualizing RTI in 21st-century secondary science classrooms: Video games' potential to provide tiered support and progress monitoring for students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4), 299-311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300407
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeely, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H., & Connors, N. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inlcusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. The Journal of Special Education, 40, 130-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030101
National Science Board. (2006). Scince and engineering indicators 2006 (Vol. 1, NSB06-01; Vol. 2, NSB 06-01A). Arlington, VA: Author.
National Science Foundation. (2000). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Office of Disability Employment Policy. (2001). Improving the availability of community-based services for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
Robinson, S. (2002). Teaching high school students with learning and emotional disabilities in inclusion science classrooms: A case study of four teachers' beliefs and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 13-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015177609052
Salajan, Florin D., Schonwetter, Dieter J., & Cleghorn, Blanie M. (2010). Student and faculty inter-generational digital divide: Fact or fiction? Computers & Education, 55(3), 1393-1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.017
Samsonov, P., Pedersen, S., & Hill, C. (2006). Using problem-based learning software with at-risk students: A case study. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 111-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v23n01_10
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Okolo, C. (2008). Science and social studies for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v41i2.6835
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
Sullivan, Peter, Tobias, Steve, & McDonough, Andrea. (2006). Perhaps the decision of some students not to engage in learning mathematics in school is deliberate. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1), 81-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-1348-8
Tyler-Wood, Tandra, Knezek, Gerald, & Christensen, Rhonda. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 341-363.
Tyson, Will, Lee, Reginald, Borman, Kathryn M., & Hanson, Mary Ann. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 12(3), 243-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10824660701601266
Waters, John K. (2011). Will the real digial native please stand up? Campus Technology, 25(2), 26-28.