Parent Perspectives on Home-Based Intervention for Young Children with Developmental Disabilities: The Parent-Implemented Communication Strategies (PiCS) Project in Illinois, USA

Authors

  • Hedda Meadan, Ph.D., BCBA-D (Author) University of Illinois image/svg+xml
    Hedda Meadan, Ph.D., BCBA-D, Associate Professor in the Department of Special Education at the University of Illinois and a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. Her research interests focus on the communication and social behavior of young children with autism and other developmental disabilities and on families of individuals with disabilities. She is a member of the editorial boards of several leading research journals in special education and has published more than 40 journal articles and book chapters on topics related to children with disabilities and families of children with disabilities.
  • Julia B. Stoner, Ed.D., CCC-SLP (Author) Illinois State University image/svg+xml
    Julia B. Stoner, Ed.D., CCC-SLP Professor Emerita at Illinois State University, is a certified speech and language pathologist and has published numerous articles related to family and professional issues, augmentative and alternative communication, assistive technology, trust and parental advocacy issues, and social-pragmatic communication interventions with young children.
  • Maureen E. Angell, Ph.D. (Author) Illinois State University
    Maureen E. Angell, Ph.D., Professor Emerita at Illinois State University, engages in single-case and qualitative research focusing on social-pragmatic communication and literacy skills, dysphagia management, differentiated instruction, systematic instructional strategies, trust and parental advocacy issues, and self-determination in individuals with disabilities.
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.279
Parents’ perspectives on a home-based, parent-implemented social-pragmatic communication intervention for young children aged 37 to 60 months with limited expressive language are presented in this report. The researchers analyzed the perspectives of seven parent participants in the Institute of Education Sciences-funded Parent-Implemented Communication Strategies (PiCS) project and their family members. Data included individual interviews with the parent interventionists, their spouses, and siblings of the target children, external evaluator findings, and survey responses. The research team employed qualitative research methodology to examine family perspectives on the PiCS project. Three major findings emerged concerning the PiCS intervention: (a) the intervention resulted in changes in the interaction between the parent interventionists and the target children, (b) the changed interaction had a positive effect on the children’s social-pragmatic communication skills, and (c) the intervention resulted in positive changes in entire families’ interactions with the target children.

Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115-1117. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115

Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Bruder, M. B. (2010). Early childhood intervention: A promise to children and families for their future. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 339-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600306

Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706300406

Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 509-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dettmer, S., Simpson, R. L, Myles, B. S., & Ganz, J. (2000). The use of visual supports to facilitate transitions of students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(3), 163-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/108835760001500307

Dunlap, G., Ester, T., Langhans, S., & Fox, L. (2006). Functional communication training with toddlers in home environments. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(2), 81-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510602800201

Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories. Lenexa, KS: Brookes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t11538-000

Fox, L., Vaughn, B. J., Dunlap, G., & Bucy, M. (1997). Parent-professional partnership in behavioral support: A qualitative analysis of one family’s experience. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, 198-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699702200403

Ganz, J. B., & Flores, M. M. (2008). Effects of the use of visual strategies in play groups for children with autism spectrum disorders and their peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 926-940. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0463-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0463-4

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

Gresham, F. M., & Lopez, M. F. (1996). Social validation: Unifying concept for school-based consultation research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 204-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088930

Hart, B. (1985). Naturalistic language training techniques. In S. F. Warren & A. K. Rogers-

Warren (Eds.), Teaching functional language (pp. 63-88). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411-420. doi:10.1901/jaba.1975.8-411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1975.8-411

Hurley, J. J., Wehby, J. H., & Feurer, I. D. (2010). The social validity assessment of social competence intervention behavior goals. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(2), 112-124. doi:10.1177/0271121409359426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121409359426

Kaiser, A. P., & Hancock, T. B. (2003). Teaching parents new skills to support their young children’s development. Infants & Young Children, 16, 9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200301000-00003

Kaiser, A. P., Hancock, T. B., & Nietfeld, J. P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Journal of Early Education and Development [Special Issue], 4, 423-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1104_4

Kaiser, A. P., & Roberts, M. Y. (2013). Parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching with preschool children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 56, 295-310. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0231)a Kashinath, S., Woods, J., & Goldstein, H. (2006). Enhancing generalized teaching strategy use in daily routines by parents of children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 466-485. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/036) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/036)

Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014544557714001

Kennedy, C. H. (1992). Trends in the measurement of social validity. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 147-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392597

Meadan, H., Angell, M. E., Stoner, J. B., & Daczewitz, M. (2014). Parent-implemented social-pragmatic communication intervention: A pilot study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, online publication 22 January 2014. doi:10.1177/1088357613517504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357613517504

Meadan, H., Ostrosky, M. M., Zaghlawan, H., & Yu, S. (2009). Promoting the social and communicative behavior of young children with autism spectrum disorders: A review of parent-implemented interventions studies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(2), 90-104. doi:10.1177/0271121409337950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121409337950

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reimers, T. M., Wacker, D. P., Derby, M. K., & Cooper, J. L. (1995). Relationship between parental attributions and the acceptability of behavioral treatments for their child’s behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 171-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299502000305

Roberts, M. Y., & Kaiser, A. P. (2011). The effectiveness of parent-implemented language interventions: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 180-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0055)

Romski, M., Sevcik, R. A., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 53, 350-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)

Schwartz, I. S. (1991). The study of consumer behavior and social validity: An essential partnership for applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 241-244. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-241

Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189

Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stoner, J. B., Meadan, H., Angell, M. E., & Daczewitz, M. (2012). Evaluation of the Parent-Implemented Communication Strategies (PiCS) project using the Multiattribute Utility (MAU) approach. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 24(1), 57-73. doi:10.1007/s11092-011-9136-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9136-0

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Turan, Y., & Meadan, H. (2011). Social validity assessments: Understanding the social importance of goals, procedures, and outcomes in early childhood special education. Young Exceptional Children, 14(3), 13-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250611415812

Turan, Y., Ostrosky, M., Halle, J. W., & DeStefano, L. (2004). Acceptability of language interventions: A comparison of preschool and elementary teachers’ responses. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 221-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510402600305

Turnbull, A., Turnbull, R., Erwin, E., Soodak, L., & Shogren, K. (2011). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Wolf, M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203

There are 35 references in total.
Meadan, H., Stoner, J. B., & Angell, M. E. (2015). Parent Perspectives on Home-Based Intervention for Young Children with Developmental Disabilities: The Parent-Implemented Communication Strategies (PiCS) Project in Illinois, USA. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 10(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.279

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted May 8, 2015
  • Published June 15, 2015
  • Issue Spring/Summer 2015
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 0
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.