Increasing Use of Research-Based Practices: Action Research Report on a College-School Partnership to Support Instruction Aligned to Middle School Common Core Math Standards for Students with Significant Disabilities

Authors

Katherine Trela, Ph.D., Wendy Gladstone-Brown, Ed.D., Norah Merritt, Ph.D., Leah Raftis, Ed.D.
  • Katherine Trela, Ph.D. (Author) Marist College image/svg+xml
    Katherine Trela, Ph.D. Dr. Trela is an Associate Professor in Special Education at Marist College in the Education Department. Prior to coming to Marist, Dr. Trela was a special education teacher in New York and North Carolina. She has worked as a Research Associate and Adjunct Professor at UNC-Charlotte and as a Curriculum and Instruction Specialist for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools’ programs for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Dr. Trela’s research interests focus on best practices to support access to general education curriculum for students with significant disabilities.
  • Wendy Gladstone-Brown, Ed.D. (Author) Marist College
    Wendy Gladstone-Brown, Ed.D. Dr. Gladstone-Brown is an Assistant Professor at Marist College in the Education Department. Prior to coming to Marist, Dr. Gladstone-Brown was a teacher in the Rush-Henrietta Central School District in Rush, New York. She worked as an Assistant Principal and Principal for the Webster Central School District. Dr. Gladstone-Brown then joined the faculty of St. John Fisher College as a Visiting Assistant Professor in 2004 and successfully defended her Doctorate in Executive Leadership in 2008 as a member of the program's first cohort. Her research interests include: Co-teaching in Inclusive Classrooms, Early Childhood Education, Professional Development Schools, and Arts in Education.
  • Norah Merritt, Ph.D. (Author) Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Education Services
    Norah Merritt, Ph.D. Dr. Merritt is the Executive Director of Human Resources for Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Services (BOCES). In this position, Dr. Merritt plans, organizes and manages Special Education financial matters for Dutchess County BOCES. In addition, she provides Professional Development to Administrative Staff, District Administration, and Committee on Special Education (CSE) chairs. Before her work in special education leadership, Dr. Merritt was a special education teacher who supported needs of diverse students at Dutchess Alternative High School.
  • Leah Raftis, Ed.D. (Author) Wappingers Central School District
    Leah Pollack Raftis, Ed.D. Leah Raftis is currently an Assistant Director of Special Education for Wappingers, New York Central School District. Prior to this position, Dr. Raftis was Director of Special Education Services at Dutchess County Board of Cooperative Education Services (BOCES). Prior to this role, she held the position of Staff Specialist: Special Education, supervising a program for students with autism spectrum disorder and coordinating the Ne w York State Alternate Assessment process for schools in Dutchess County. Dr. Raftis holds a Bachelor of Science degree in general education, a Master’s degree in special education, and a Certificate of Advanced Study in school and district leadership. Dr. Raftis successfully defended her dissertation focusing on administrative supports for students with autism in inclusive settings in March 2017.
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.367
Teachers of students with significant cognitive disabilities have expressed the need for additional training and resources to realign instruction to general education standards. At the same time, pre-service teachers preparing to enter the field of special education need to be placed in classrooms where teachers have updated knowledge and skills to deliver grade-aligned instruction to students in this population. In this project, the needs of both groups were addressed through a partnership between an Institute of Higher Education (IHE) and local board of cooperative education services. Specifically, in-service teachers received training in research-based practices to implement grade-aligned math instruction to middle school students with significant cognitive disabilities. Pre-service teachers who received the same training in their college coursework created adapted materials to implement the instruction. Results of the project’s effect on in-service teachers, their students, and pre-service teachers are reported. Implications for future directions in professional development are discussed.

Allsopp, D.H., DeMarie, D., Alvarez-McHatton, P., & Doone, E. (2006). Bridging the gap Between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter 2006, 19-35.

Browder, D.M., Jimenez, B., & Trela, K. (2012). Grade-aligned math for secondary students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 373-388.

Browder, D., Trela, K., Courtade, G., Jimenez, B., Knight, V., & Flowers, C. (2012). Teachingmathematics and science standards to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 46, 26-35. doi:10.1177/0022466910369942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910369942

Browder, D. M., Wood, L., Thompson, J., & Ribuffo, C. (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC-3). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center. Retrieved from: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configurations

Council for Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (2015). http://caepnet.org/standards/standard-2

Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and Teaching Ratio and Proportion: Research Implications. In D. Owens (Ed.), Research Ideas for the Classroom (pp. 159-178). NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R.C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher Development in the United States and abroad. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

Ergul, C., Baydik, B., & Demir, S. (2013). Opinions of in-service and pre-service special education teachers on the competencies of the undergraduate special education programs. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13, 518-522.

Goldstein, J., & Behuniak, P. (2012). Assessing students with significant disabilities on academic content. Journal of Special Education, 46, 117-127. doi:10.1177/0022466910379156. Hoffer, A. (1988). Ratios and proportional thinking. In T. Post (Ed.). Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research based methods (pp. 285-313). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) of 2004, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.

Kalchman, M., and Koedinger, K.R. (2005). Teaching and learning functions. In S. Donovan and J. Bransford (Eds.). How students learn: History, mathematics and science in the classroom (pp. 351-396). Washington, DC: National Academy Press Kleinert, H.L., Kennedy, S., & Kearns, J.F. (1999). Impact of alternate assessments: A statewide teacher survey. Journal of Special Education, 33, 93-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699903300203

Kretlow, A.G., Cooke, N.L., Wood, C.L. (2012). Using in-service and coaching to increase teachers' accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 348-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510395397

Lee, A., Browder, D.M., Flowers, C., & Wakeman, S. (2016). Teacher evaluation of resources designed for adapting mathematics for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41, 132-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916634099

Leko, M.M., & Brownell, M.T. (2009). Crafting quality professional development for special educators: What school leaders should know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42,1, 64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990904200106

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington D.C. Copyright Date: 2010 http://www.corestandards.org/

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, PL 107-110, Stat. 1425, 20 U.S.C. §§6301 et seq.

Prater, M.A. & Sileo, T.W. (2002). School-University partnerships in special education field experiences: A national descriptive study. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 325-334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230060301

Roach, A., Elliott, S. & Berndt, S. (2007). Teacher perceptions and the consequential validity ofan alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18, 168-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073070180030501

Sarama, J., Clements, D., Swaminatha, S., McMillen, S., & Gonzalez Gomez, R.M. (2003). Development of mathematical concepts of two-dimensional space in grid environments: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 283-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_03

Snyder, E. P. (2002). Teaching students with combined behavioral disorders and mental retardation to lead their own IEP meetings. Behavioral Disorders, 27, 340–357. SymWriter 2 [Computer Software]. (2014). http://www.widgit.com/products/symwriter/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290202700411

Timberlake, M.T. (2014). Weighing costs and benefits: Teacher interpretation and implementation of access to the general education curriculum. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 83-99. doi:10.1177/1540796914544547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914544547

Towles-Reeves, E., Kearns, J., Kleinert, H., & Kearns, J. (2009). An analysis of the learning characteristics of students taking alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 42, 241-254. doi:10.1177/0022466907313451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907313451

Trela, K., & Jimenez, B. (2013). From different to differentiated: Using “Ecological Framework” to support personally relevant access to general curriculum for students with intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 117-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813807714537

Wehmeyer, M., Lattin, D., Lapp-Rincker, G. & Agran, M. (2003). Access to the generalcurriculum of middle school students with mental retardation: an observational study.Remedial and Special Education, 24, 262-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240050201

Wilson, S.M., Floden, R.E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher Preparation Research: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Recommendations. Research report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education and Office for Educational Research. Retrieved September 20, 2015 from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.

Witzel, B.S., Mercer, C.D., & Miller, M.D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning disabilities: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 121-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00068

There are 25 references in total.
Trela, K., Gladstone-Brown, W., Merritt, N., & Raftis, L. (2018). Increasing Use of Research-Based Practices: Action Research Report on a College-School Partnership to Support Instruction Aligned to Middle School Common Core Math Standards for Students with Significant Disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 13(2), 84-106. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.367

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted May 22, 2018
  • Published June 15, 2018
  • Issue Spring/Summer 2018
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 0
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.