Is Practice in a Mixed-Reality Environment Better than Role Play for Promoting Implementation Fidelity of the Constant Time Delay Procedure for Special Education Undergraduates?

Authors

  • Melissa E. Hudson, Ph.D. (Author) East Carolina University image/svg+xml
    Dr. Melissa E. Hudson is an Assistant Professor in the College of Education, Department of Special Education, Foundations, and Research at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina. Her research interests include general curriculum access and inclusive education for learners with severe disabilities, and special education teacher preparation. In addition to teaching full-time at ECU, Dr. Hudson is currently working on the leadership team for Project CONVEY, a 5-year, $1.25 million grant from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, to collaboratively prepare Special Education, School Psychology, and Speech-Language Pathology graduate students to work together to improve outcomes for learners with significant support needs. Dr. Hudson taught learners with severe disabilities for 10 years in the public schools and is the author of more than 16 publications and nine book chapters on topics related to learners with severe disabilities and teacher preparation.
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.448
Preservice undergraduates should acquire many skills in their teacher preparation program that support them as future effective teachers. For special education preservice teachers, one of these important skills is teaching with the constant time delay procedure, an evidence-based practice for teaching learners with moderate or severe disabilities. In this study, participants first learned to use the constant time delay procedure in class and then practiced the procedure either with an avatar in a mixed-reality environment (experimental group) or with a peer in a classroom role play activity (control group). Participants then used the procedure to teach vocabulary words to a learner. A pre-experimental group design was used to compare the fidelity of implementation of the procedure for both groups. A paired t-test compared the number of correct constant time delay trials implemented for participants in both groups and found no significant difference between types of experience (mixed-reality or role play) and correct use of the procedure. Implications for practice include a discussion of what additional instructional supports preservice undergraduates might need to implement the constant time delay procedure with fidelity.

Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.

Browder, D. M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Spooner, F., Mims, P. J., & Baker, J. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach picture and word recognition to identify evidence-based practice for students with severe developmental disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75, 343-364. doi:10.1177/001440290907500305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500305

Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A., & Wakeman, S. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74, 407-432. doi:10.1177/001440290807400401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400401

Collins, B. C. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

Courtade, G. R., Test, D. W., & Cook, B. G. (2015). Evidence-based practices for learners with severe intellectual disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 305-318. doi:10.1177/1540796914566711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796914566711

Dawson, M. R., & Lignugaris/Kraft, B. (2017). Meaningful practice: Generalizing foundation teaching skills from TLE TeachLivETM to the classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40, 26-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416664184

Dieker, L. A., Hynes, M. C., Hughes, C. E., Hardin, S., & Becht, K., (2015). TLE Teach LivE™: Using technology to provide quality professional development in rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 34, 11-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051503400303

Dieker, L., Hynes, M., Hughes, C., & Smith, E. (2008). Implications of mixed reality and simulation technologies on special education and teacher preparation. Focus on Exceptional Children, 40, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v40i6.6877

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research. Competencies for analysis and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Hudson, M. E., Browder, D. M., & Wood, L. (2013). Review of experimental research on academic learning by students with moderate and severe intellectual disability in general education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 17-29. doi:10.2511/027494813807046926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813807046926

Hudson, M. E., Rivera, C. J., & Grady, M. M. (2018). Research on mathematics instruction with students with significant cognitive disabilities – Has anything changed? Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43, 38-53. doi:10.1177/1540796918756601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918756601

Hudson, M. E., Voytecki, K., Owens, T. L., & Zhang, G. (2019). Preservice teacher experiences implementing classroom management practices through mixed reality simulations. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 38, 79-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870519841421

Hudson, M. E., Voytecki, K. S., & Zhang, G. (2018). Mixed-reality teaching experiences improve preservice special education students’ perceptions of their ability to manage a classroom. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 11(2), 1-17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v11i2.7308

Judge, S., Bobzien, J., Maydosz, A., Gear, S., & Katsioloudis, P. (2013). The use of visual-based simulated environments in teacher preparation. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1, 88-97. doi:10.11114/jets.v1i1.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v1i1.41

Kaufman, D., & Ireland, A. (2016). Enhancing teacher education with simulations. Tech Trends, 60, 260-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0049-0

Leko, M. M., Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., & Kiely, M. T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82, 25-43. doi:10.1177/0014402915598782 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782

Rao, D., & Stupans, I. (2012). Exploring the potential of role play in higher education: Development of a typology and teacher guidelines. Innovations in Education and TeachingInternational, 49, 427-436. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.728879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.728879

Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., Jimenez, B., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practice in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 62-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.62

Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D., & Smith, B. R. (2012) Evidence-based practices for teaching academic skills to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374-387. doi:10.1177/0741932511421634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511421634

There are 19 references in total.
Hudson, M. E. (2021). Is Practice in a Mixed-Reality Environment Better than Role Play for Promoting Implementation Fidelity of the Constant Time Delay Procedure for Special Education Undergraduates?. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 16(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.448

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted January 14, 2021
  • Published February 15, 2021
  • Issue Winter 2021
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 0
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.