Facilitating Student Engagement Using Optimal Trunk Support for Children with Postural Dysfunction

Authors

  • Dr. Thilagha Jagaiah (Author) University of Hartford image/svg+xml
    Dr. Thilagha Jagaiah is an Assistant Professor of Special Education and a Program Director in the Education Department at the University of Hartford. She has expertise in foundational skills of sentence-construction, writing instruction and intervention, multi-tiered or RTI systems of support, and evidence-based practices for students with learning disabilities, individualized education plan, special education law, and assessment. Dr. Jagaiah has directed and co-directed two-internal grant research projects focused on syntactic complexity and its relationship to writing quality in informative and narrative essays and optimizing trunk support to improve academic engagement for children with disabilities through school-based experimental research.
  • Dr. Sandra Saavedra (Author) University of Hartford
    Dr. Sandra Saavedra is an Associate Professor of Physical Therapy at the University of Hartford. She has more than 25 years clinical experience in pediatric physical therapy, and is a national leader in research, teaching and application of segmental principles to treatment of posture impairments. Her degrees include MS in Physical Therapy from University of Southern California, PhD in Human Physiology from University of Oregon and postdoctoral research at University of Michigan. Her ongoing research is focused on typical and atypical development of trunk control and has been funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.512
Children with postural dysfunction experience difficulties keeping their bodies upright. Without appropriate trunk support, these children are not able to effortlessly control their head and trunk even for a short duration and could impact learning engagement. The purpose of this feasibility study was to examine if optimal trunk support enhances student engagement tasks (eye gaze, reaching, manipulation, head turn, and making choice), and if the student engagement varied between the initial and final measures for both the customized and usual devices over a six- to eight-week period. Video data of nine children from early intervention and K-12 were recorded and coded for student engagement tasks. Findings reveal significant improvement in student engagement when using the customized device. The average effect size for student engagement for the customized compared to the usual device in the initial and final measures exceeded 0.8.

Bausch, M., & Ault, M. J. (2012). Status of assistive technology instruction in university personnel preparation programs. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 8(1), 1-14.

Bond, M, & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagemenr through educational technology: Towardsa conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1): 11 doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528

Bridgman, A. (2014). Cognitive function and self-regulation. Child Development. 85, 1771-1776. doi:10.1111/cdev.12307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12307

Brown, F., & Cohen, S. (1996). Self-determination and young children. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps. 21(1):22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699602100105

Butler, P., Saavedra, M. S., Sofranac, M. M., Jarvis, M. S., & Woollacott, M. (2010). Refinement, reliability and validity of the segmental assessment of trunk control (SATCo). Pediatric physical therapy: the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association, 22(3), 246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181e69490

Campbell, P.H. & Wilcox, M. J. (2004). Briefing book: Tots n tech research institute on assistive technology for infants and toddlers. (Available from Thomas Jefferson University, Child and Family Studies Research Programs, 5th Floor Edison, 130 S. 9th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107)

Cook, R. E., Richardson-Gibbs, A. M., & Dotson, L. N. (2016). Strategies for Including Children with Special Needs in Early Childhood Settings. United States: Cengage Learning.

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., Lawson, M. A. (2016) Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction 43: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Gillies, D., Wilson, A., Soden, R., Gray, S., McQueen, I. (2010). Capital, culture and community: Understanding school engagement in a challenging context. Improving Schools, 13, 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480209352548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480209352548

Goodworth, A. D., Wu, Y. H., Felmlee, D., Dunklebarger, E., & Saavedra, S. (2016). A trunk support system to identify posture control mechanisms in populations lacking independent sitting. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 25(1), 22-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2541021

Hadders-Algra M. (2005). Development of postural control during the first 18 months of life. Neural plasticity, 12(2-3), 99–272. https://doi.org/10.1155/NP.2005.99 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/NP.2005.99

Horn, E. M., & Kang, J. (2012). Supporting young children with multiple disabilities: What do we know and what do we still need to learn? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411426487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411426487

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20, U.S.C. § 1401: Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/idea/law.htm

Lee, J.S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a Myth or Reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107 (3), 177–185. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.807491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491

Mistrett, S. (2004). Assistive technology helps young children with disabilities participate in daily activities. Technology in Action, 1(4), 1–8.

Ostensjo I. (2009). Assistive devices for children with Disabilities In: Söderback I, (Ed.), International handbook of occupational therapy interventions (pp. 141-146.) New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75424-6_12

Rachwani, J., Santamaria, V., Saavedra, S. L., & Woollacott, M. H. (2015). The development of trunk control and its relation to reaching in infancy: a longitudinal study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00094

Rangvid, B.S. (2018) Student engagement in inclusive classrooms. Education Economics, 26:3, 266-284, doi:10.1080/09645292.2018.1426733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1426733

Saavedra, S. L., & Woollacott, M. H. (2015). Segmental contributions to trunk control in children with moderate-to-severe cerebral palsy. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 96(6), 1088-1097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.016

Santamaria, V., Rachwani, J., Saavedra, S. L., & Woollacott, M. H. (2016). The impact of segmental trunk support on posture and reaching in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric physical therapy: the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association, 28(3), 285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000273

Shin, J. W., Song, G. B., & Ko, J. (2017). The effects of neck and trunk stabilization exercises on cerebral palsy children's static and dynamic trunk balance: case series. Journal of physical therapy science, 29(4), 771–774. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.771

Student Engagement (2014, April 28). In S. Abbott (Ed.). The glossary of educational reform by Great School Partnership. Retrieved from http://edglossary.org/student-engagement

Verbecque, E., Vereeck, L., and Hallemans, A. (2016). Postural sway in children: a literature review. Gait Posture 49, 402–410. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.003

Wang, M.T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x

There are 24 references in total.
Jagaiah, T., & Saavedra, S. (2023). Facilitating Student Engagement Using Optimal Trunk Support for Children with Postural Dysfunction. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 18(1), 72-94. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.512

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted January 11, 2023
  • Published February 15, 2023
  • Issue Winter 2023
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 0
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.