The Impact of Assistive Technology on Vocabulary Acquisition of a Middle School Student with Learning Disabilities and Limited English Proficiency: A Descriptive Case Study Analysis

Authors

  • James E. Gentry, Ed.D. (Author) Tarleton State University image/svg+xml
  • Pam Lindsey, Ph.D. (Author) Tarleton State University
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.53
Vocabulary acquisition traditionally has been a struggle for students with special learning needs. This study involved an eleven year old fifth grade student with learning disabilities in reading and writing and limited English proficiency. Assistive technology assistance was provided from the Franklin Language Master 6000b and Microsoft’s Power Point 2003. Visual representation (e.g., student drawings) was also used to aid student connections to an individual vocabulary word in the context of the text read. Best practices pedagogy (i.e., trade book use, choice, discovery, interactive learning, reciprocal teaching, and repetition) were utilized and have been framed in a lesson structure entitled, Individualized Direct Vocabulary Discovery Method with Assistive Technological Scaffolding (IDVDMATS). This case study provides readers rich descriptions of the special vocabulary learning needs of one student following the IDVDMATS approach.

Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bottomley, D., Truscott, D., Marinal, B., Henk, W., & Melnick, S., (1999). An affective comparison of whole language, literature-based and basal reader literacy instruction. Reading Research and Instruction, 38 (2), 115-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079909558282

Chak, A. (2007). Teachers' and parents' conceptions of children's curiosity and exploration. International Journal of Early Years Education, 15(20), 141-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760701288690

Choate, J. S. (2000). Successful inclusive teaching: Proven ways to detect and correct special needs (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Council for Children with Learning Disabilities. (2004). What are some common signs of learning disabilities? Retrieved June 22, 2004, from http://www.ldonline.org/ccldinfo/2.html

Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dale, E. & Chall, J.S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26(1), 19-26.

Denzin, N. (1984). The research act. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Donaldson, M. L. & Nash, M. (2005). Word learning in children with vocabulary deficits. Journal of Speech ,Language, and Hearing Research, 48 (2), 439-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/030)

DuBay, W. (2004). The principals of readability. Impact Information, Retrieved Sunday, September 9, 2007 from http://www.impact-information.com/impactinfo/readability02.pdf

Feagin, J., Orum, A., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (1991). A case for case study. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

Feiwell, S. K. (1997). The relation among self-concept, attitudes and reading achievement in reading-disabled children. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International, 58 (03), 736A.

Feld, B. (1948). Empirical test proves clarity adds readers. Editor and Publisher, 81(1), 38.

Flesch, R. (1946). The art of plain talk. New York City: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

Flesch, R. (1948); A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532

Flesch, R. (1949). The art of readable writing. New York City: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

Flesch, R. (1960). How to write, speak, and think more effectively. New York City: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

Fosnot, C.T. (Ed.). (2005). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). New York City: Teachers College Press.

Fountas, I. & Pinnell, G.S. (2006). Teaching for comprehending and fluency: Thinking, talking, and writing about reading, K-8. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Garderen, D. (2004). Focus on inclusion: Reciprocal teaching as a comprehension strategy for understanding mathematical word problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 225-229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560490272702

Gentry, J. (1995). Willie the worm and dyslexia: A 17-year follow-up. Journal of Child Neurology, 10 (1), S106-S107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08830738950100S121

Gentry, J. (2006). The Impact of e-Publishing Assistive Technology in an Inclusive Sixth Grade Social Studies Classroom on Students' Content Learning, Writing, Spelling, and Motivation: A descriptive comparison. (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66 (11), 321A.

Gentry, J., Fowler, T. & Nichols, B. (2007). Textbook Preferences: The Possibilities of individualized learning in social studies with an individualized textbook. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 493-510.

Galeano, R. (2006). Development of bilingual communicative competence through play: A case study. (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (04), 266A.

Goldman, S., Cole, K., & Syer, C. (1999, July 12-13). The technology/content dilemma. Paper presented at the Secretary’s Conference on Educational Technology. Retrieved June 7, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/techconf99/whitepapers/paper4.html

Gunning, R. (1968). The technique of clear writing (Revised ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hancock, D. & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research. New York: Teachers College Press.

Hardman, M. L., Drew, C. J., Egan, M. W., & Wolf, B. (1993). Human exceptionalities: Society, school, and family (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.

Hardyck, C.D. & Petrinovich, L.F. (1970). Subvocal speech and comprehension level as a function of the difficulty level of reading material. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 647-652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80027-5

Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. University of Denver. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17, 20 U. S. C. § 101, 1400 et seq. Retrieved June 14, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/idea/idea.pdf

Kincaid, J. P.; Fishburne, R. P., Jr.; Rogers, R. L.; and Chissom, B. S. (1975); Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel, Research Branch Report 8-75, Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA006655

Klare, G.R. (1974). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 62-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747086

Klare, G.R., Shuford, E.H., & Nichols, W.H. (1957). The relationship of style. Difficulty, practice, and ability to efficiency of reading and retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41(1), 222-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047962

Kush, J. C., & Watkins, M. W. (1996). Long term stability of childrens' attitudes toward reading. Journal of Educational Research, 5, 315-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941333

Laurice, J. M.& McCachran, M. (2003). Comparison of a word study phonics technique between students with moderate to mild mental retardation and struggling readers without disabilities, Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(3), 192-199.

Lazarus, D., & Callahan, T. (2000). Attitudes toward reading expressed by elementary school students diagnosed with learning disabilities. Reading Psychology, 21 (4), 233-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/027027100750061921

LD Online (2003). ABCs of LD. Retrieved January 4, 2007, from http://www.ldonline.org/article/5613

Leu, D.J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthall, D.P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. III (pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Male, M. (1994). Technology for inclusion: Meeting the special needs of all students (2nd ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Male, M. (1997). Technology for inclusion: Meeting the special needs of all students. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mathewson, G.C. (2000). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & S. Harry (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 1131-1159). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitudes toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 46, 626–639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.43.8.3

McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934-956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/748205

McLaughlin, V. B. (2006). Interactive book reading between bilingual caregiver and Head Start child. (Doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, 2006). Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (02), 242A.

Molebash, P. & Fisher, D. (2003). Teaching and learning literacy with technology. Reading Improvement, 40 (2), 63-70.

Murphy, D. (1947). How plain talk increases readership 45% to 60%. Printer’s Ink, 220, 35-37.

National Information Center for Children and Youth with Disabilities (1997). General information about learning disabilities. Retrieved January 4, 2007, from http://www.kidsource.com/NICHCY/learning_disabilities.html

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Noble, T. H. (2006). The Last Brother: A Civil War Tale. Chelsea, MI: Thomson.

Office of Disabilities Services (ODS) at Haverford College (2003). What is a learning disability? Retrieved January 4, 2007, from http://www.haverford.edu/ods/learning.html

Pikulski, J.J. & Templeton, S. (2004). Teaching and developing vocabulary: Key to long-term reading success. Retrieved January 6, 2007, from http://www.eduplace.com/marketing/nc/pdf/author_pages.pdf

Pyecha, J. (1988). A case study of the application of noncategorical special education in two states. Chapel Hill, NC: Research Triangle Institute.

Richek, M. A. (2005). Words are wonderful: Interactive, time-efficient strategies to teach meaning vocabulary. Reading Teacher, 58(5), 414-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.58.5.1

Sampson, M. B., Rasinski, T. V., & Sampson, M R. (2003). Total literacy: Reading, writing, and learning (3rd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Wadsworth/Nelson Thomas Learning.

Schlenker, R. & Tierney, K. (2006). Bacterial fisson, powers of two, sociology, environmental science, public health, biology, mathematics: An integration of constructivism, discovery, and inquiry. Science Activities, 42( 4), 28-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/SATS.42.4.28-39

Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (eds) (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Schramm, W. (1947). Measuring another dimension of newspaper readership. Journalism Quarterly, 24, 293-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769904702400401

Silberman, M. (2006). Teaching actively: Eight steps and 32 strategies to spark learning in any classroom. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Slater, W. H. & Horstman, F. R. (2002). Teaching reading and writing to struggling middle school and high school students: The case for reciprocal teaching. Preventing School Failure, 46(4), 163-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10459880209604416

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Swanson, C.E. (1948). Readability and readership: A controlled experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 25, 339-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107769904802500402

Teaching LD (2005). Understanding learning disabilities. Retrieved January 4, 2007, from http://www.teachingld.org/understanding/default.htm

Trochim, W. (1989). Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90052-9

Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (2005). Content area reading: Literacy and learning across the curriculum. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Vacca, R. T. & Vacca, A. L. (2008). Content area reading: literacy and learning across the curriculum (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Waring, R. & Takaki, M. (2003) At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader? Reading in a Foreign Language 15(2), 130-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66776

Weitzel, D. (2003). Who’s reading your writing? Retrieved December 18, 2006, from Colorado State University, Cooperative Extension Web site: http://www.ext.colostate.edu/PUBS/octnews/oc030602.html

Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.

Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Zull, J.E. (2002). The art of changing the brain. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

There are 72 references in total.
Gentry, J. E., & Lindsey, P. (2008). The Impact of Assistive Technology on Vocabulary Acquisition of a Middle School Student with Learning Disabilities and Limited English Proficiency: A Descriptive Case Study Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 3(2), 81-111. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.53

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted May 1, 2008
  • Published June 15, 2008
  • Issue Summer 2008
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 4
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.