Assessment Beyond IQ

Authors

  • Donna Riccio Omichinski, B.A. (Author) Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Michigan image/svg+xml
  • Marie Van Tubbergen, Ph.D. (Author) Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Michigan
  • Seth Warschausky, Ph.D. (Author) Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation University of Michigan
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.58
A component of a school assessment plan includes traditional IQ testing, often referred to as psychological or psycho-educational testing. Psycho-educational testing can yield information about how a student compares to others in her grade or age group, individual strengths and needs, and recommendations to improve instruction. The intended purpose of intelligence testing is to measure a person’s cognitive abilities. However, current testing practices rely a great deal on a child’s ability to perform the tests physically by pointing to, writing, or speaking a response to the test question. Using this kind of testing to estimate the cognitive abilities of a child with severe physical and speech impairments is like measuring the cognitive abilities of a visually impaired person by their ability to visually read a test question, or using an English language test to measure the IQ of someone who does not speak English. Parents should question whether or not the assessments will meet the three primary standards of reliability, validity and accessibility. Parents’ advocacy efforts will be most effective if they are informed, assertive, cooperative, and specifically emphasize the need for accessible testing procedures.

Boake, C. (2002). From the Binet-Simon to the Wechsler-Bellevue: Tracing the History of Intelligence Testing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 383-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.3.383.981

Cortiella, C. (2006), NCLB and IDEA: What parents of students with disabilities need to know and do. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

Lezak, M. (1988), IQ: RIP. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 351-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638808400871

Kohler, P.D., Field, S. (2003). Transition-focused education: Foundation for the future. Journal of Special Education, 37, 174-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030701

Sabbadini, M., Bonanni, R., Carlesimo, G., & Caltagirone, C (2001), Neuropsychological assessment of patients with severe neuromotor and verbal disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 169-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00301.x

Omichinski, D. R., Van Tubbergen, M., & Warschausky, S. (2008). Assessment Beyond IQ. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 3(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.58

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted August 6, 2008
  • Published October 15, 2008
  • Issue Fall 2008
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 1
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.