The Use of a Rubric as a Tool to Guide Pre-Service Teachers in the Development of IEPs

Authors

  • Clarissa E. Rosas, Ph.D. (Author) College of Mount Saint Joseph. image/svg+xml
    Clarissa Rosas is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Programs in Special Education at the College of Mount Saint Joseph. She has been a special education teacher, and an administrator at the district and school level. She earned a Ph.D. in Special Education from the University of New Mexico.
  • Kathleen G. Winterman, Ed.D (Author) Xavier University image/svg+xml
    Kathleen G. Winterman is an Assistant professor at Xavier University. She served as a special educator and elementary principal for eighteen years. Her primary focus has been best practices in early childhood, Autism, and teacher preparation. She earned her Master's degree in Special Education and doctorate of Special Education from the University of Cincinnati.
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.170
The challenge of developing Individualized Education Program documents that are representative of a team decision making process and are in compliance with IDEA 2004 is well documented in the literature. One of the main objectives of IEPs is to serve as the foundation of a child’s academic program. Inclusion of children with disabilities in the general curriculum requires active involvement of all members of the child’s educational team. In an effort to instruct pre-service teachers in the development of compliant IEPs, this study investigated the use of an IEP Rubric to assist teacher candidates in the development of compliant IEPs. Results of the study indicate that the use of an IEP Rubric shows promise as an instructional tool to help in the preparation of preservice teachers.

Blanton, L. P., Griffin, C. C., Winn, J. A., & Pugach, M. C. (1997). Teacher education in transition: Collaborative programs to prepare general and special education teachers. Denver, CO: Love.

Brownell, M. T., Ross, D. D., Colon, E. P., & McCallum, C. L. (2005). Critical features of special education teacher preparation: A comparison with general teacher education. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 242–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050380040601

De La Paz, S. (2009). Rubrics: Heuristics for Developing Writing Strategies. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(3), 134-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508408318802

Griffin, C. C., Jones, H. A., & Kilgore, K. L. (2007). The unintended side effects of including students with learning disabilities for teacher educators. Learning Disabilities, 14(3), 195–204.

Holdheide, L., & Reschly, D. J. (2008). Teacher preparation to deliver inclusive services to students with disabilities (TQ Connection Issue Paper). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved March 4, 2011, from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/TeacherPreparationtoDeliverInclusiveServices.pdf

Isaacson, J.J., & Stacy, A.S. (2009). Rubrics for clinical evaluation: Objectifying the subjective experience. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), Issue 2, 134-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.10.015

Jonsson, A. (2010). The use of transparency in the ‘Interactive examination’ for student teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 183-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003694441

Lee-Tarver, A., (2006). Are individualized education plans a good thing? A survey of teachers' perceptions of the utility of IEPs in regular education. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 263-272.

Mansilla, V., Duraisingh, E., Wolfe, C. R., & Haynes, C. (2009). Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing. Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 334-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11779016

Reddy, Y. & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435-448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859

Rosas, C., Winterman, K.G., Kroeger, S., Jones, M. (2009). Using a rubric to assess individual education programs. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 4, (1), 47-57.

Rosas, C., & Winterman, K.G. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions on Special Education preparation: A descriptive study. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals (JAASEP) 3, 119-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.123

Ross, D. D., Stafford, L., Church-Pupke, P., & Bondy, E. (2006). Practicing collaboration: What we learn from a cohort that functions well. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29(1), 32–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640602900105

Van Laarhoven, T., Munk, D. D., Lynch, K., Wyland, S., Dorsch, L. Z., Bosma, J. (2006). Project ACCEPT: Preparing pre-service special and general educators for inclusive education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 29, 209–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640602900401

Winn, J., & Blanton, L., (2005). The call for collaboration in teacher education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 38(2), 1–10. Winterman, K., & Rosas, C., (under review). Examining the AYP Status for Students with Disabilities: Are Students with Disabilities Successfully Achieving State Standards? DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v38i2.6816

Yell, M. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2003). Developing legally correct and educationally meaningful IEPs using curriculum-based measurement. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(34), 73–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770302800308

There are 16 references in total.
Rosas, C. E., & Winterman, K. G. (2012). The Use of a Rubric as a Tool to Guide Pre-Service Teachers in the Development of IEPs. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 7(1), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.170

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted December 22, 2011
  • Published February 15, 2012
  • Issue Winter 2012
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 1
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.