Applying Empathy Curriculum to Enhance the Role of the Paraprofessional for Students with Multiple Disabilities

Authors

  • Christopher Russel (Author) CUNY, Queens College image/svg+xml
    Christopher Russell is the Project Coordinator for the New York Deaf-Blind Collaborative, a USDOE Office of Special Education Programs Technical Assistance and Dissemination grant. He has experience as a classroom teacher and Teacher of the Visually Impaired (TVI) working with children who have visual impairments and additional disabilities including deaf- blindness. He is adjunct faculty at Hunter College, CUNY, in the graduate personnel preparation programs for Blindness/Visual Impairment, and Childhood Special Education: Severe/Multiple Disabilities.
  • Soribel Genao, PhD (Author) CUNY, Queens College
    Soribel Genao is an Associate Professor of Educational Leadership at CUNY Queens College. Her research has focused on examining the diverse systemic issues in and reform of urban schools while assessing administrative, teacher, and community collaborations that facilitate more positive student academic and behavioral outcomes such as student retention in marginalized communities. She has institutionally lead the development of a dual Masters and certificate in Educational Leadership with an emphasis on Bilingual Education programs at the P-20 level at Queens College. Her national and international work reminds of intersectionality: that is, gender is but one of several identities individuals hold (e.g., ethnicity, racial preference, sexuality) and these identities interconnect to influence each person’s experiences, anyone of which can become a negative stereotype.
https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.473
The primary aim of this paper is to address how empathy curriculum can be applied to training needs of paraprofessionals working with students who have multiple disabilities. A thorough review of the literature on the role of the paraprofessional and implications for training and supervision is provided. This is juxtaposed with a review of the literature on empathy training/curriculum, and a discussion on the potential for applying empathy curriculum to existing needs for paraprofessional training. Results of a survey of 32 paraprofessionals working with students with multiple disabilities across New York State are presented. The survey emphasizes paraprofessionals’ experience with training relevant to components of empathy, and self-reported perceptions of effectiveness in developing positive relationships and supporting holistic educational programs for students with multiple disabilities. The review and synthesis of literature from these two fields, and the survey results, suggest that empathy curriculum is a relevant area of training need to paraprofessionals, and further research is warranted on the topic.

Abbate-Vaughn, J. (2007). Paraprofessionals left behind? Urban paraprofessionals' beliefs about their work in the midst of NCLB. Journal of Poverty, 11(4), 143-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J134v11n04_07

Alsop, L., Killoran, J., Robinson, C., Durkel, J., & Prouty, S. (2004). Recommendations on the Training of Interveners for Students who are Deafblind. Monmouth, OR: NTAC: National Technical Assistance Consortium for Children and Adults Who Are Deaf-Blind.

Alsop, L. (2004). Competencies for training interveners to work with children and students with deafblindness. SKI-HI Institute.

Barr, J. J. (2013). Student-teachers’ attitudes toward students with disabilities: Associations with contact and empathy. International Journal of Education and Practice, 1(8), 87-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61/2013.1.8/61.8.87.100

Bearman, M., Palermo, C., Allen, L. M., & Williams, B. (2015). Learning empathy through simulation: A systematic literature review. Simulation in healthcare, 10(5), 308-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000113

Bevel, M., & Altrogge, G. (2010). Preparing future administrators and teachers: Developing empathy for individuals with disabilities. Journal of Philosophy & History of Education, 60, 52-56.

Biggs, E. E., Gilson, C. B., & Carter, E. W. (2016). Accomplishing more together: Influences to the quality of professional relationships between special educators and paraprofessionals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 256-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916665604

Boske, C., Osanloo, A., & Newcomb, W. S. (2017). Exploring Empathy to Promote Social Justice Leadership in Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 27(3), 361–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461702700303

Bothma, F. C., Lloyd, S., & Khapova, S. (2015). Work identity: Clarifying the concept. In P. W. Jansen & G. Roodt (Eds.), Conceptualising and measuring work identity: South African perspectives and findings (pp. 23-51). Heidelberg, Netherlands: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9242-4_2

Brock, M. E., Seaman, R. L., & Downing, C. (2017). Promoting learning for a student with a severe disability through paraprofessional training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 211-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917729682

Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2015). Effects of a professional development package to prepare special education paraprofessionals to implement evidence-based practice. The Journal of Special Education, 49(1), 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466913501882

Brock, M. E., & Carter, E. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered educational practices to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38(4), 211-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800401

Carter, E. W., Sisco, L. G., & Lane, K. L. (2011). Paraprofessional perspectives on promoting self-determination among elementary and secondary students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1-2), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.1

Chopra, R. V., Sandoval-Lucero, E., & French, N. K. (2011). Effective Supervision of Paraeducators: Multiple Benefits and Outcomes. National Teacher Education Journal, 4(2).

Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) (2015). Specialty set: Special education paraprofessionals. What Every Special Educator Must Know: Ethics, Standards, and Guidelines for Special educators (6th Ed.). Retrieved December, 2019 from https://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/Standards/Paraeducator%20Sets/Specialty%20Set%20%20Special%20Education%20Paraeducator.pdf

Council for Exceptional Children (CEC) (2010). Specialty Set: Special Education Paraeducator Intervener for Individuals with Deafblindness (PDBI). Retrieved from https://nationaldb.org/groups/page/9/interveners-and-qualified-personnel

Douglas, S. N., Uitto, D. J., Reinfelds, C. L., & D’Agostino, S. (2019). A systematic review of paraprofessional training materials. The Journal of Special Education, 52(4), 195-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918771707

Drigas, A., & Papoutsi, C. (2015). Empathy, special education and ICTs. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 3(4), 37-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v3i4.5192

Eccleston, S. T. (2010). Successful collaboration: Four essential traits of effective special education specialists. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 11(1), 40-47.

Giangreco, M. F., Doyle, M. B., & Suter, J. C. (2012). Constructively responding to requests for paraprofessionals: We keep asking the wrong questions. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 362-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511413472

Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., & Broer, S. M. (2001). Respect, appreciation, and acknowledgment of paraprofessionals who support students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(4), 485-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290106700404

Giangreco, M. F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong?. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1

Hudgins, K. S. (2012). Creating a collaborative and inclusive culture for students with special education needs. McNair Scholars Research Journal, 5(1), 8.

Hughes, M. T., & Valle‐Riestra, D. M. (2008). Responsibilities, preparedness, and job satisfaction of paraprofessionals: Working with young children with disabilities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(2), 163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760701516892

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004). Retrieved December, 2019 from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/regs/b/a/300.8/c/7

Irvin, D. W., Ingram, P., Huffman, J., Mason, R., & Wills, H. (2018). Exploring paraprofessional and classroom factors affecting teacher supervision. Research in developmental disabilities, 73, 106-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.013

Kam, C. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Kusché, C. A. (2004). Sustained effects of the PATHS curriculum on the social and psychological adjustment of children in special education. Journal of emotional and behavioral disorders, 12(2), 66-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266040120020101

Kitchen, J. (2005). Conveying respect and empathy: Becoming a relational teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 195-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960500288374

Lam, T. C. M., Kolomitro, K., & Alamparambil, F. C. (2011). Empathy training: Methods, evaluation practices, and validity. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 7(16), 162-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v7i16.314

Lankes, R. D. (2011). The atlas of new librarianship. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8755.001.0001

Martens, M. (2014). The intervention model for affective involvement and its effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen).

Martens, M. A., Janssen, M. J., Ruijssenaars, W. A., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. (2014). Introducing an intervention model for fostering affective involvement with persons who are congenitally deafblind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(1), 29-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1410800104

Martin, T., & Alborz, A. (2014). Supporting the education of pupils with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: The views of teaching assistants regarding their own learning and development needs. British Journal of Special Education, 41(3), 309-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12070

National Center on Deaf-Blindness (NCDB). (2018). The 2017 National Child Count of Children and Youth who are Deaf-Blind. Monmouth, OR: National Center on Deaf-Blindness, The Research Institute, Western Oregon University. Retrieved from New York State Department of Education (NYSED) (2019). Level I teaching assistant certification. Retrieved December, 2019 from http://www.highered.nysed.gov/tcert/certificate/typesofcerts/taone.html

New York City Department of Education (NYCDOE) (2019). Paraprofessionals and substitute paraprofessionals. Retrieved December, 2019 from https://www.schools.nyc.gov/careers/other-jobs-in-schools/paraprofessionals-and-substitute-paraprofessionals

McGrath, M. Z., Johns, B. H., & Mathur, S. R. (2010). Empowered or Overpowered? Strategies for Working Effectively with Paraprofessionals. Beyond Behavior, 19(2), 2-6.

Parker, A.T., Schalock, M., Steele, N., Chopra, R., Cook, L., Sobel, D., Kennedy, B.M.S., Monaco, C., & Zobel, G. (2017). Participatory curriculum development to meet community needs: Open Hands, Open Access: deaf-blind intervener learning modules. DbI Review (58), 69-73.

Ruppar, A. L., Neeper, L. S., & Dalsen, J. (2016). Special education teachers’ perceptions of preparedness to teach students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 273-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916672843

Quinn, JS, Ferree, MM. Schools as workplaces: Intersectional regimes of inequality. Gender Work Organ. 2019; 26: 1806– 1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12224

Silberman, R. K. (2000). Educating students with visual Impairments and other exceptionalities. Foundations of education: History and theory of teaching children and youths with visual impairments. New York: AFB Press.

Stetson, E. A., Hurley, A. M., & Miller, G. E. (2003). Can universal affective education programs be used to promote empathy in elementary aged children? A review of five curricula. Journal of Character Education, 1(2), 129.

Stockall, N. S. (2014). When an aide really becomes an aid: Providing professional development for special education paraprofessionals. Teaching exceptional children, 46(6), 197-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914537202

Tews, L., & Lupart, J. (2008). Students with Disabilities' Perspectives of the Role and Impact of Paraprofessionals in Inclusive Education Settings 1. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 5(1), 39-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00138.x

Walker, V. L., Douglas, K. H., & Chung, Y. C. (2017). An Evaluation of Paraprofessionals' Skills and Training Needs in Supporting Students with Severe Disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 32(3), 460-471.

There are 44 references in total.
Russel, C., & Genao, S. (2021). Applying Empathy Curriculum to Enhance the Role of the Paraprofessional for Students with Multiple Disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 16(3), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.64546/jaasep.473

Downloads

Article Information

  • Article Type Articles
  • Submitted August 9, 2021
  • Published October 15, 2021
  • Issue Fall 2021
  • Section Articles
  • File Downloads 0
  • Abstract Views 0
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.