Effects of an Intervention on Math Achievement for Students with Learning Disabilities
Belfiore, P. J., Lee, D. L., Scheeler, M. C., & Klein, D. (2002). Implications for behavior momentum and academic achievement for students with behavior disorders. Psychology in Schools, 39, 171-179. doi:10.1002/pits.10028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10028
Carnine, D. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 199-206. doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1976.9-199
Carr, M., & Davis, H. (2001). Gender differences in arithmetic strategy use: A function of skill preferences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 330-347. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1059
Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first grade mathematics strategy use: Social and meta-cognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 318-328. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.89.2.318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.2.318
Cieslar, W., McLaughlin, T. F., & Derby, K. M. (2008). Effects of copy, cover, and compare procedure on math and spelling performance of a high school student with behavioral disorder: A case report. Preventing School Failure, 52(4), 45-51. doi:10.3200/PSFL.52.4.45-52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.4.45-52
Codding, R., Channetta, L., Palmer, M., & Lukita, G. (2009). Examining a classwide application of cover, copy, compared with and without goal setting to enhance mathematics fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(3), 173-185. doi:10.1037/a0017192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017192
Codding, R. S., Eckert, T. L., Fanning, E., Shiyko, M., & Solomon, E. (2006). Comparing mathematics interventions: The effects of cover, copy, compare alone and combined with performance feedback on digits correct and incorrect. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 125-141. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9006-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9006-x
Codding, R. S., Shiyko, M., Russo, M., Birch, S., Fanning, E., & Jaspen, D. (2007). Comparing mathematics interventions: Does initial level of fluency predict intervention effectiveness? Journal of School Psychology, 45, 603-617. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.005
DeSimone, J. R., & Palmer, R. S. (2006). Middle school mathematics teacher’s beliefs about inclusion of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21, 98-110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00210.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00210.x
Glago, K., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2009). Improving problem solving of elementary students with mild learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 372-380. doi:10.1177/0741932508324394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324394
Jennings, J., & Sohn, H. (2014). Measure for measure: how proficiency-based accountability systems affect inequality in academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 87, 125-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714525787
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L. B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586-597. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.586
/edu/index.aspx Joseph, L. M., & Schisler, R. (2009). Should adolescents go back to basics? A review of teaching word reading skills to middle and high school students. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 131-147. doi:10.1177/0741932508315646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315646
Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. (2003). Mathematics for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114. doi:10.1177/0741932508315646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240020501
Lee, M. J., & Tingstrom, D. H. (1994). A group math intervention: Modification of cover, copy, and compare for group application. Psychology in Schools, 31, 133-145. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(199404)31:2<133::AID-PITS2310310208>3.0.CO;2-G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(199404)31:2<133::AID-PITS2310310208>3.0.CO;2-G
Marston, D. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What is it and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York, NY: Guilford.
Milsom, A., & Glanville, J. L. (2010). Factors mediating the relationship between social skills and academic grades in a sample of students diagnosed with learning disabilities or emotional disturbance. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 241-251. doi:10.1177/0741932508327460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508327460
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2007). Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
National Governors Association & Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief States’ School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, C.F.R. (2002).
Pearson Education. (2008). AIMSWeb progress monitoring and RTI system. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Author.
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Axtell, P. K. (2010). An investigation of detect, practice, and repair (DPR) to remedy math-fact deficits in a group of third-grade students. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 342-353. doi:10.1002/pits.20474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20474
Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Jaspers, K. (2007). Evaluating and comparing interventions to enhance math accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 27-37. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9025-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9025-7
Shadish, W. P., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inferences. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skill problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Shinn, M. R. (2002). Identifying and defining academic problems: CBM screening and eligibility procedures. In S. N. Elliot & J. C. Witt (Series Eds.) & M. R. Shinn (Volume Ed.), Curriculum based-measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 90-129). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., Williams, S., & Johns, G. A. (1997). Altering response to topography to increase response efficiency and learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54-64. doi:10.1037/h0088947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088947
Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K. L., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412-420. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1989.12085436
Thurber, R. S., Shinn, M. R., & Smolkowski, K. (2002). What is measured in mathematics tests? Construct validity of curriculum-based mathematics measures. School Psychology Review, 31, 498-513. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086170
Downloads
Article Information
- Article Type Articles
- Submitted December 19, 2015
- Published February 15, 2016
- Issue Winter 2016
- Section Articles